Case 68 · Democratic institutions
Chandigarh mayor poll. Ballots defaced on camera
30 Jan 2024
'Murder of democracy'. Supreme Court.
928 days since Nobody has been held to account.
What happened
Claim against record
What the government said
The officer first claimed the ballots were already defaced; the Supreme Court rejected this after watching the video.
What the record shows
'Murder of democracy'. Supreme Court.
Caught on tape, the officer's conduct was defended in court by the government's own law officer. The Supreme Court called it a murder of democracy, said the officer should be prosecuted, and took the rare step of counting the voided votes itself to declare the rightful winner, delivering the accountability the system had refused.
What accountability should have looked like
Ministers and office-holders responsible
- Conduct of the pollReturning Officer · local BJP
Naming who held the portfolio is a matter of public record. It is not by itself a finding of personal responsibility for any death or any rupee.
Sources
T1 primary record · T2 reporting · T3 partisan
Ask them officially. File an RTI Know a better source? Add one
Cite or export this case
Citizens' Accountability Ledger, "Chandigarh mayor poll. Ballots defaced on camera" (30 Jan 2024), case-31. https://whoisresponsible.xyz/case/case-31/
JSON for this case The whole ledger as CSV
Quote the case id rather than the number on the card. The id never changes; the number shifts whenever an older case is added ahead of this one.