Case 67 · Democratic institutions
Election Commission law. The Chief Justice written out
Dec 2023
Watchdog's independence diluted
961 days since Recorded outcome: Watchdog's independence diluted.
What happened
Claim against record
What the government said
The government said Parliament, not the judiciary, is entitled to design the appointment process.
What the record shows
Watchdog's independence diluted
Months after the Court tried to insulate the poll body by adding the Chief Justice, Parliament legislated the Chief Justice back out, handing the ruling side a built-in majority in choosing the referee of its own elections. The umpire's independence was diluted by law, and the government's convenience was the obvious winner.
What accountability should have looked like
Ministers and office-holders responsible
- Law and Justice MinisterArjun Ram Meghwal
Naming who held the portfolio is a matter of public record. It is not by itself a finding of personal responsibility for any death or any rupee.
Sources
T1 primary record · T2 reporting · T3 partisan
- T2 PRS summary of the CEC and ECs Bill, 2023 ↗ Archived copy
- T1 Supreme Court, Anoop Baranwal v Union of India ↗ Archived copy
Ask them officially. File an RTI Know a better source? Add one
Cite or export this case
Citizens' Accountability Ledger, "Election Commission law. The Chief Justice written out" (Dec 2023), case-30. https://whoisresponsible.xyz/case/case-30/
JSON for this case The whole ledger as CSV
Quote the case id rather than the number on the card. The id never changes; the number shifts whenever an older case is added ahead of this one.