Case 20 · Consumer harm
Saradha. Small savers cleaned out, and politicians in the frame
Surfaced Apr 2013
Depositors ruined. Investigation still crawling.
4,862 days since Nobody has been held to account.
What happened
Claim against record
What the government said
The state government said it had set up its own commission and a compensation fund for depositors, and characterised the central investigation as politically motivated.
What the record shows
Depositors ruined. Investigation still crawling.
The investigation became a jurisdictional fight between the central agency and the state government, culminating in a police commissioner being questioned over destroyed evidence and the state refusing cooperation. More than a decade on, senior political figures named early have not been tried, and depositors have recovered a fraction of what they lost.
Contested / alleged
What accountability should have looked like
Ministers and office-holders responsible
- Regulation of deposit-taking; accused of obstructing the CBIWest Bengal state government
- Collective investment regulation; acted years after the schemes beganSecurities and Exchange Board of India
Naming who held the portfolio is a matter of public record. It is not by itself a finding of personal responsibility for any death or any rupee.
Sources
T1 primary record · T2 reporting · T3 partisan
- T2 Deccan Herald: SC orders CBI probe into the chit fund scam ↗
- T2 ThePrint: SC declines to monitor the Saradha probe ↗
Ask them officially. File an RTI Know a better source? Add one
Cite or export this case
Citizens' Accountability Ledger, "Saradha. Small savers cleaned out, and politicians in the frame" (Surfaced Apr 2013), case-82. https://whoisresponsible.xyz/case/case-82/
JSON for this case The whole ledger as CSV
Quote the case id rather than the number on the card. The id never changes; the number shifts whenever an older case is added ahead of this one.