Case 51 · Rights and dissent
Pegasus. Spyware, and a refusal to answer
18 Jul 2021
Neither confirmed nor denied
1,854 days since Recorded outcome: Neither confirmed nor denied.
What happened
Claim against record
What the government said
The government dismissed the reporting as an attempt to malign Indian democracy and cited national security.
What the record shows
Neither confirmed nor denied
Rather than say plainly whether the state had bought or used the spyware, the government neither confirmed nor denied it, and then withheld cooperation from the Supreme Court's own technical committee, which reported it could not get the government to engage. A clean denial was never offered. The question was simply left to rot.
Contested / alleged
What accountability should have looked like
Ministers and office-holders responsible
- Oversight of surveillanceUnion Home and IT Ministries
Naming who held the portfolio is a matter of public record. It is not by itself a finding of personal responsibility for any death or any rupee.
Sources
T1 primary record · T2 reporting · T3 partisan
- T1 SC order constituting Pegasus committee, Oct 2021 ↗ Archived copy
- T2 Pegasus Project findings, The Wire, July 2021 ↗ Archived copy
Ask them officially. File an RTI Know a better source? Add one
Cite or export this case
Citizens' Accountability Ledger, "Pegasus. Spyware, and a refusal to answer" (18 Jul 2021), case-15. https://whoisresponsible.xyz/case/case-15/
JSON for this case The whole ledger as CSV
Quote the case id rather than the number on the card. The id never changes; the number shifts whenever an older case is added ahead of this one.